Visit Cletus Wilbury's column >>

CLETUS WILBURY

Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 23; Links Seeded: 38
Member Since: 2/2008Last Seen: 2/09/2010

California has a 'public option' that works fine

Read ArticleArticle Source: The San Diego Union-Tribune
advertisement

Some excerpts:

...
In 1911, California and a number of other states passed the nation's first workers' compensation laws, aimed at ensuring medical care and lost wages for injured workers. ...
By 1914, Washington, Oregon, Nevada and Wyoming banned private workers' comp insurers, creating state-run "single-payer" monopolies instead. Today, 15 states have such monopolies. California and the other states formed not-for-profit entities to compete with private insurers. ... Insurers hated the idea. ...
Competition from the fund spurred the private insurers to slash rates. One company cut rates by 30 percent. Others offered their customers free service for a month or similar enticements. Several small insurers could not keep pace and went out of business.
...
But after a while, the State Fund and the private insurers found they could coexist. The State Fund attracted mom-and-pop firms too small to merit the attention of the major insurers, as well as high-risk occupations such as roofing or welding. The private insurers sought out larger employers, which allowed them to offer relatively low rates through economies of scale. ...
Around 2000, as a deadly price war between private insurers forced two dozen firms into bankruptcy, the State Fund took on their clients. In 2003, as rates among the surviving insurers skyrocketed, the fund briefly held 52 percent of the market as it took on businesses that could no longer afford the private policies. The fund is now back to historical norms, with about $22 billion in assets. ...
There are now more than 50 private insurers in California, holding 80 percent of the market.

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.5
{"commentId":8868949,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

Good example of a government insurance option.

{"commentId":8868949,"threadId":"652239","contentId":"3157487","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
    Reply#1 - Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:53 AM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"652239","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"652239","contentId":"3157487"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking